SIMILITARY- IMITATION
I RECEIVED MANY MAILS ABOUT THE IMPORTANT THEMATIC-
WITH VERY GOOD THOUGHTS- THANK YOU!!
1)AS INTERNATIONAL HUMOR ART JURY MEMBER,I NOTIFIED, AND I RESCUED “THE ORIGINALITY LEVEL” OF THE CARTOON IN THE CONCEPTUAL IMAGINATIVE EXPRESSION ,AND ALSO IN THE RENEW DESIGN PROPOSAL-
TO ME IS IMPORTANT TO GATHER THE CREATIVE INTENTION OF THE AUTHOR,IT MEANS, THAT THE DESIGN MUST BE FLUID, ANSWER OF THE OWN INTERNAL DEVELOPPMENTS- GENERALLY, THE AUTHORS THAT CREATED SUCH KIND OF CARTOONS ARE ADULTS MASTERS, OR NAIF CHILDREN-
SO, THE DEFINITION OF THE DESIGN, IS AUTHENTICALLY HARD,WITHOUT IMITATION OR SIMILITUDES INTENTIONS-
2) THE IMITATION IS VERY BAD ,IT IS A PUNTUAL WAY, AGAINST COPYRIGHTS IS A LEVEL OF PLAGIARISM-
THERE ARE CULTURAL ICONS ( LIBERTY STATUE ,FAMOUS PAINTINGS mona lisa- , SCIENCE SIMBOLS ….) THERE ARE FIX REFERENCES, TO CREATED OVER THEM , WITH ORIGINALITY IN THE THOUGHT AND THE DESIGN, IN THE ASSOCIATIONS,OR IN THE NEW TECHNICAL METHODS-(COMPUTER-OPTICAL PENCIL that give a new focus,)
A JURY MEMBER MUST BE VERY INFORMED ABOUT THE PUBLISHED CARTOONS AND THE DIFFERENT THEMATICS PROPOSALS THROUGH THE TIME- IT IS HER / HIS RESPONSABILITY-
3) PERSONALLY, I WOULD RATHER PREFER , MASTERS CARTOONISTS HAS JURY MEMBER, IS THE GUARANTEE. TO A GOOD HUMOR ART, APRECIATION.
RAQUEL ORZUJ– URUGUAY